linker3000
04/04/2009, 00:21
Is see that Enta has written up a 'matter of fact' report on the Kingston outage, but has not touched upon several points - notably:
1) Why a whole POP can be taken down by a fibre patch fault.
2) Why an engineer was dispatched from Telford to drive to Kingston - that's 164 frikkin miles in 3 hours according to the AA - rather than there being a local service presence for a key installation. FFS - Even I'm nearer in West Sussex and could have been there with a full network engineering kit, including spare fibre patch leads, in about 1.5 hours.
3) Why between them, the Enta and NTL engineers did not carry sufficient spare kit - in this case a fibre patch lead - to repair the fault, leading to them taking one from the WBC service (cutting off all WBC-connected users) to fix the fault. That's so stupid it's laughable. Jeez - I have only three cabinets of kit to manage at Head office and there's at least one spare Cat 5e lead and fibre patch hooked over a cable tray arm in each one 'just in case'.
4) Why, overall, an MSO (Major Systems Outage) lasted around 7 hours when the ultimate fix was a 1 minute job to replace a fibre patch lead.
5) What they are doing to remedy this pisspoor response to a simple fault and to ensure that such a fault is fixed within a reasonable period of time - and for a key data centre this should be about 5 minutes, 15 if an engineer has to be called out.
The root cause of the fault has not been directly spelled out, but it seems to have been caused by some fibre work being undertaken in the same cabinet, which raises the question of where the hell did *that* engineer go, who was that engineer, who did they work for and why did they not notice they had left a tray cover open and either damaged or accidentally disconnected a fibre link?
I suppose I have to direct these questions through James as I am an ADSL24 customer, but I would like some answers from Enta - especially since we have two ADSL24 links 'on trial' and it was a long-term intention to consider moving these and around 30 others to one supplier (they are currently split between BT and Zen), but on the strength of evidence that leads me to the conclusion that Enta's networing technical ability could be bettered by a team of Kwik Fit fitters, I doubt if anyone tied to Entanet will get the business - which would be a shame as James and his team are constantly battling the challenges created for them by Enta, yet they do the absolute best with what they have got to offer.
James, I have to ask: Have the resellers officialy met, or had words, with Enta about this incident? Any response? Do they care? Do they acknowledge the response to the MSO was a complete farce?
Yours - not happy, and I am a tolerant person.
Linker3000
1) Why a whole POP can be taken down by a fibre patch fault.
2) Why an engineer was dispatched from Telford to drive to Kingston - that's 164 frikkin miles in 3 hours according to the AA - rather than there being a local service presence for a key installation. FFS - Even I'm nearer in West Sussex and could have been there with a full network engineering kit, including spare fibre patch leads, in about 1.5 hours.
3) Why between them, the Enta and NTL engineers did not carry sufficient spare kit - in this case a fibre patch lead - to repair the fault, leading to them taking one from the WBC service (cutting off all WBC-connected users) to fix the fault. That's so stupid it's laughable. Jeez - I have only three cabinets of kit to manage at Head office and there's at least one spare Cat 5e lead and fibre patch hooked over a cable tray arm in each one 'just in case'.
4) Why, overall, an MSO (Major Systems Outage) lasted around 7 hours when the ultimate fix was a 1 minute job to replace a fibre patch lead.
5) What they are doing to remedy this pisspoor response to a simple fault and to ensure that such a fault is fixed within a reasonable period of time - and for a key data centre this should be about 5 minutes, 15 if an engineer has to be called out.
The root cause of the fault has not been directly spelled out, but it seems to have been caused by some fibre work being undertaken in the same cabinet, which raises the question of where the hell did *that* engineer go, who was that engineer, who did they work for and why did they not notice they had left a tray cover open and either damaged or accidentally disconnected a fibre link?
I suppose I have to direct these questions through James as I am an ADSL24 customer, but I would like some answers from Enta - especially since we have two ADSL24 links 'on trial' and it was a long-term intention to consider moving these and around 30 others to one supplier (they are currently split between BT and Zen), but on the strength of evidence that leads me to the conclusion that Enta's networing technical ability could be bettered by a team of Kwik Fit fitters, I doubt if anyone tied to Entanet will get the business - which would be a shame as James and his team are constantly battling the challenges created for them by Enta, yet they do the absolute best with what they have got to offer.
James, I have to ask: Have the resellers officialy met, or had words, with Enta about this incident? Any response? Do they care? Do they acknowledge the response to the MSO was a complete farce?
Yours - not happy, and I am a tolerant person.
Linker3000