J. J. Farrell
03/08/2009, 00:42
I noticed that the LLU hardware tests page (http://adsl24.co.uk/support/llu/) shows that the Broadcom-based Thomson routers don't support Annex M. I beg to differ as evidenced below :)
Uptime: 32 days, 17:26:39
DSL Type: G.992.5 Annex M US 56
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 2,277 / 22,099
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [GB/GB]: 1.49 / 11.06
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 13.0 / 18.0
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 11.0 / 21.0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 3.0 / 3.5
Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / BDCM
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 28 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down): 125,134 / 0
CRC Errors (Up/Down): 125,134 / 24,090
HEC Errors (Up/Down): 38,276 / 13,600
Most (all?) versions of Be's BeBox are rebranded versions of these routers, and they certainly support Annex M since it's one of Be's features. The graphs from the BeBox/SpeedTouch stats analysis site at http://be.nfshost.com/ show lots of Annex M data points.
Uptime: 32 days, 17:26:39
DSL Type: G.992.5 Annex M US 56
Bandwidth (Up/Down) [kbps/kbps]: 2,277 / 22,099
Data Transferred (Sent/Received) [GB/GB]: 1.49 / 11.06
Output Power (Up/Down) [dBm]: 13.0 / 18.0
Line Attenuation (Up/Down) [dB]: 11.0 / 21.0
SN Margin (Up/Down) [dB]: 3.0 / 3.5
Vendor ID (Local/Remote): TMMB / BDCM
Loss of Framing (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Signal (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Power (Local/Remote): 0 / 0
Loss of Link (Remote): 0
Error Seconds (Local/Remote): 28 / 0
FEC Errors (Up/Down): 125,134 / 0
CRC Errors (Up/Down): 125,134 / 24,090
HEC Errors (Up/Down): 38,276 / 13,600
Most (all?) versions of Be's BeBox are rebranded versions of these routers, and they certainly support Annex M since it's one of Be's features. The graphs from the BeBox/SpeedTouch stats analysis site at http://be.nfshost.com/ show lots of Annex M data points.